Democratic System

Judged by people,
not an algorithm.

No editor at the centre decides what deserves attention. Members rate posts, flag what breaks the rules, and can push back on a flag they think is unfair. Those judgements — together with how recent a post is — decide what rises and what falls, and the flags behind them are out in the open.

Rating

One person, one rating,
counted equally.

Rating a post — one to five stars — is how members say what they think of it. A rating is a signed record that syncs across the network like the post itself.

  • Each person gives a post one rating, and can change it later. Every rating counts the same — no one accumulates extra weight, and no one buys a louder voice.
  • Ratings are anonymous. Anyone can see how a post was rated, star by star, but not who gave which rating. Emoji reactions are the public way to respond — anyone can see who reacted.
  • Rating counts as a contribution. It earns points the way posting does — half a point for a rating, one for a post — so an evaluation is a contribution in its own right, not a throwaway tap.
  • Ratings help lift good work: the All feed ranks posts by their average rating and how recent they are. Newest and Followed are simply chronological, and suggested posts are picked from what you spend time viewing.

“Posts may be demoted or hidden based on votes from users.”Pixelmine Terms of Service · Posted Content Storage

No downvote

Rate what you think.
Flag what breaks the rules.

There is no thumbs-down button. A low star rating says you didn’t think much of a post; to say it breaks the rules, you flag it — and a flag makes you name which reason applies, so the claim is specific rather than a silent tap.

  • The difference is deliberate. A rating is a matter of taste; a flag is a claim that something is wrong, and it has to say what.
  • It makes disagreement legible. A post that is hidden is hidden for stated reasons, counted reason by reason — not beneath an invisible tide of dislike.
  • And it makes disagreement answerable. You cannot argue with a vague downvote. You can argue with a claim.
Flagging

Eight ways to say
this doesn’t belong.

Reporting is not a vague “I don’t like this”. A flag names the specific reason, so the claim being made is clear to everyone who sees it — including the person who posted.

False news

A claim that the post spreads something untrue — misinformation dressed as fact.

Scam

A claim that the post exists to defraud, trick, or take something from the people who see it.

Inappropriate

A claim that the content does not belong here, whatever its intent.

Offensive

A claim that the post is abusive or demeaning toward the people reading it.

Violence

A claim that the post depicts, threatens, or glorifies harm done to people.

Spam

A claim that the post is repetition or unsolicited promotion rather than a genuine contribution.

Sensitive issue

A claim that the subject needs careful handling — not necessarily wrong, but not something to stumble into unwarned.

Against regional policies

A claim that the post breaks rules applying where it is being seen. What is permitted is not identical everywhere.

Counter-flagging

A flag is a claim,
not a verdict.

This is the part that makes it democratic rather than merely reactive. A flag does not settle anything on its own — anyone who thinks it is unfair can counter it, and that counter marks the flag down. Judgement is a conversation between members, not an appeal to a company.

A member flags a post The flag names a reason Anyone who disagrees counters it Counters ≥ flags? YESThe post stands NO The flag holds: hidden after 24h
A flag, contested
  • A counter-flag is a disagreement placed on the record: it says the flag itself was wrong, and marks it down accordingly.
  • Counters can be withdrawn as easily as they are given. Removing your counter marks the flag back up, so nobody is locked into a judgement they have changed their mind about.
  • The balance between flags and counters is what matters, not whoever shouted first. One counter answers one flag, and whichever side is ahead when the 24 hours are up decides the outcome.
  • Because both sides of the argument are visible, a pile-on is legible as a pile-on rather than hidden inside a moderation queue.
Flag weights

Every flag counts once.
So does every counter.

There is no hidden multiplier behind a report. Once an account is old enough to flag, its flag weighs exactly the same as anyone else’s — and a counter-flag weighs exactly the same as a flag.

Seven days before you can flag

An account has to be at least seven days old before it can flag or counter-flag. A swarm of freshly made accounts cannot be spun up to take a post down.

One flag, one weight

Every flag counts as one, and every counter-flag cancels exactly one flag. No account’s judgement is worth more than another’s.

24 hours to answer

The clock starts at the first flag. For the next 24 hours the post stays visible — though in the All feed a flagged post ranks below unflagged ones — and anyone who thinks the flag is unfair can counter it.

More flags than counters, and it’s hidden

If flags still outnumber counter-flags when the 24 hours are up, the post is hidden. A tie, or more counters than flags, and the post stands. Once a post is hidden, a later counter-flag can’t bring it back.

Three levels

What’s yours alone,
and what’s everyone’s.

Not every judgement deserves the same reach. Pixelmine keeps a clear line between what quietly reshapes your own feed and what contributes to a verdict everybody lives with.

Yours alone

Block someone, or hide their posts, and your feed changes — nobody else’s does. It is a preference about your own experience, not a verdict on anyone.

The post

Rate, flag, or counter a flag, and you are adding to a shared judgement that shapes how everyone else encounters it.

The community

The same rating and flagging apply to community content, so a community’s own posts answer to exactly the rules everything else does.

On the record

Your judgement carries
your signature.

A rating or a flag is not a counter being incremented in some database. It is a record signed with your key, travelling the network like any post, and nodes check the signature before they accept it from one another.

  • A flag is tied to the key that signed it, so nobody can pin a flag on you that you never raised.
  • Records keep their signature as they sync, so a node passing on a rating or a flag can’t rewrite it along the way.
  • Your ratings still stay anonymous to other members: what they see is the star-by-star breakdown, not who gave it.
  • Even the private judgements are signed. Blocks and hides only touch your own feed, but they are provably yours all the same.
Keeping it honest

The rules behind
the judgements.

Any system where evaluation carries weight invites people to game it. Pixelmine’s Terms of Service set the rules, and breaking them can cost an account.

  • Posting spam, or information that is false or can’t be verified, is prohibited.
  • Pretending to be someone else, or claiming an affiliation you don’t have, is prohibited.
  • Anything that interferes with the service or its network is prohibited, and Pixelmine can restrict or cancel an account that breaks the rules.
  • Flag counts are public, reason by reason, so a pile-on is visible to everyone rather than hidden in a private score.
Where it stops

What the community
doesn’t decide.

Being straight about the limits matters more than the word “democratic” does. The community’s judgement governs what rises and what is treated as a violation — but it is not sovereign over everything.

Under its Terms, Pixelmine can restrict or cancel an account that breaks the rules. Deleting an account is a request Pixelmine approves, and once an account is deleted its ratings no longer count toward any post.

In short

Evaluation belongs
to the evaluated.

One rating each, counted equally. Flags that name their reason. Counters that can hold them off. It is a slower, noisier way to decide what is good than an algorithm — and it belongs to the people it affects.